Security Zoning and Shrinking Public Space
PROJECT HOME
METHODOLOGY
SECURITY ZONE MAPS
SOURCES
ABOUT US
BLOG
LA SF NY
us_map
SF
LA
NYC
CLICK on a city to view security zone maps
SECURITY ZONE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
We developed an objective set of assessment criteria to differentiate methods and classify security zones based on their levels of restriction.
LEVEL OF RESTRICTION
None Moderate High
Access No physical impediments to access No entrances blocked but some temporary physical impediments to access Permanent physical impediments to access or entrances blocked
Surveillance No security personnel present One security guard present Several security personnel present
Behavior Behavior unrestricted Behavior limited by either physical or legal restrictions Behavior limited by both physical and legal restrictions
Security zones are given an overall classification based on combinations of scores from the three assessment criteria.
  • * Open: 'None' on all three criteria
  • * Limited: 'Moderate' on all three criteria, or combination of multi-category scores
  • * Closed: 'High' on all three criteria
The security zone assessment criteria table served as the foundation for the design of the database and the data collection process undertaken in Los Angeles and San Francisco.1
The maps of the security zones in the three cities provide an indication of the extent to which security zones are infringing on urban public space.
1This chart is derived from the published study: Németh J. and J. Hollander (forthcoming). Lost space: Security zones and New York City's shrinking public space. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. Notably, the "mobility" category changed to "behavior" in this subsequent work.
Summary
Assessment Criteria
Data Collection
CLOSE MENU
Site Selection
New York
Los Angeles
San Francisco
Summary of Results
CLOSE MENU
Project Home
Methodology
Security Zone Maps
Sources
About Us
Blog
Website Design by Decision Support Resources